Russian drone shot down in Ukraine, April 2022 Mvs.gov.ua, CC BY 4.0
Addressing the Way forward for Fight: Overcoming Interoperability, Functionality Gaps, and Countermeasures in Drone Warfare
Throughout an in depth briefing on Could 13, 2024, titled “Drone Warfare: NATO, Ukraine, Israel, and the Pink Sea,” hosted by the Middle for European Coverage Evaluation (CEPA), main protection specialists gathered to debate the important challenges of integrating drones into trendy army operations. Federico Borsari, Lance Landrum, Sarah Krajewski, Joanne van der Merwe, and Gordon B. “Skip” Davis, Jr. shared their insights on how technological developments, notably drones, are reshaping warfare.
Federico Borsari opened the session by figuring out three major challenges confronted by army organizations when integrating drones: interoperability, functionality gaps, and counter-UAS methods. These themes framed the discussions, emphasizing the complicated dynamics of adopting drone expertise in a transatlantic protection context.
1. Interoperability: Gordon B. “Skip” Davis, Jr. detailed the difficulties in reaching interoperability amongst NATO allies, noting the various methods and requirements in use. “Interoperability is arguably the most important problem for the time being,” Davis acknowledged, explaining how this situation complicates collaborative efforts in information change and operational coordination throughout totally different army platforms.
2. Functionality Gaps: The panel mentioned the potential gaps that many NATO international locations face, notably in sturdy drone applied sciences. Lance Landrum underscored the significance of addressing these gaps to keep up operational effectiveness. “Many NATO international locations are lagging when it comes to sturdy drone capabilities, not simply within the air, but in addition in different domains which might be turning into an increasing number of important,” he remarked, highlighting the pressing want for technological upgrades and enhancements.
3. Counter-UAS Methods: The need for efficient countermeasures towards hostile drones was one other key level of dialogue. Federico Borsari elaborated on the necessity for complete protection methods that embody each materials and non-material elements. “Regardless of elevated focus and sources, many NATO international locations are usually not well-positioned to counter what’s turning into a really vicious and purposeful menace coming from drones,” he noticed, indicating a big space of concern for army planners.
All through the briefing, the specialists agreed that whereas drones provide quite a few tactical benefits, their efficient integration requires overcoming vital strategic challenges. These embody growing interoperable methods, filling functionality gaps, and enhancing counter-UAS measures.
This CEPA briefing not solely make clear the urgent points surrounding drone warfare but in addition set the stage for future discussions on how greatest to combine these superior applied sciences into cohesive and efficient army methods.
Learn extra:
