Eight in ten assume it’s essential for Canada to put money into clear vitality alternatives in response to American Inflation Discount Act investments in local weather motion
Within the newest spherical of survey work by Clear Power Canada and Abacus Knowledge, Canadians consider a clear vitality system that features hydro, wind, solar energy and electrical autos could be each extra reasonably priced and safer than a fossil gasoline vitality system.
Key findings embrace:
- Two thirds assume a clear vitality system could be extra reasonably priced than a fossil gasoline vitality system. This view is shared by a majority in each area or province, aside from Alberta. Over seven in ten Liberal, NDP, and Inexperienced Get together supporters really feel this manner, as do 4 in 10 Conservative Get together supporters.
- Two thirds additionally assume a clear vitality system could be safer – that’s, a system the place costs and provide are much less influenced by purpose markets. This view is shared by a majority in each area or province, together with in Alberta. Over three in 4 Liberal, NDP, and Inexperienced Get together supporters really feel this manner, as do half of Conservative Get together supporters.
- Just below half of Canadians are conscious of the Inflation Discount Act handed by the U.S. authorities that invests $370 billion {dollars} into local weather motion to spur funding in clear vitality and greenhouse gasoline emission reductions.
- When requested whether or not it’s important or not for Canada to additionally put money into clean-energy-related financial alternatives, 83% say it’s both very or considerably essential. Massive majorities in each area of the nation and throughout the political spectrum share this view.
Upshot
In response to David Coletto, Chief Government Officer of Abacus Knowledge: “Perceptions in regards to the affordability and safety of unpolluted vitality have gotten clearer as geopolitical battle and rising inflation impression Canadians immediately. A transparent majority consider {that a} clear vitality system can be each extra reasonably priced and safer than one primarily based on fossil fuels.”
In response to Trevor Melanson, Communications Director of Clear Power Canada: “More and more, Canadians see that the transition to wash vitality isn’t solely an financial alternative—however a possibility to decrease their vitality payments. Canadians additionally acknowledge clear vitality as safer. This view displays actuality, as clear vitality electrical energy charges are much less beholden to international markets.”
Methodology
The survey was carried out with 1,500 Canadian adults from November 25 to December 1, 2022. A random pattern of panelists had been invited to finish the survey from a set of accomplice panels primarily based on the Lucid change platform. These companions are usually double opt-in survey panels, blended to handle out potential skews within the knowledge from a single supply.
The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random pattern of the identical dimension is +/- 2.5%,
19 occasions out of 20.
The information had been weighted in keeping with census knowledge to make sure that the pattern matched Canada’s inhabitants in keeping with age, gender, academic attainment, and area. Totals might not add as much as 100 on account of rounding.
This survey was paid for by Clear Power Canada.
