Vitality Return On Funding Rears Its Misshapen Head Once more

Join each day information updates from CleanTechnica on e-mail. Or comply with us on Google Information!

Over the previous 12 months or so, power return on power invested (EREOI) has proven up a number of instances for me as an assault on applied sciences are actually superior. A nuclear transport advocate tried to gotcha me with that for biofuels for transport. Others fairly requested about it for biofuels on the whole. And there’s loads of disinformation floating round about fossil fuels vs renewables, being unfold by the fossil gas trade.

It’s time for some disambiguation.

Let’s begin with what EREOI is. Fairly easy, truly. It takes power to get power right into a kind usable by us, whether or not that’s extracting and refining oil or constructing a wind turbine. The ratio between the power you get out versus the power you place in is the EREOI. And to be clear, it’s over the lifetime of the manufacturing from the asset, whether or not it’s an oil properly, a hydroelectric dam or a wind turbine.

Agriculture makes power within the type of energy which we eat. The agricultural revolution 10,000 years in the past resulted in a extra optimistic EREOI than searching and gathering, so civilization arose. A optimistic EREOI is fairly good for us. The Inexperienced Revolution doubled EREOI to about 4:1, so now now we have much more meals for lots much less work. The truth is, we make a lot meals nowadays that we throw away a 3rd of it globally, about 2.5 billion tons, one thing which is a significant local weather headache as a result of waste meals finally ends up emitting loads of methane which is so much worse for international warming than carbon dioxide.

It was that oil had actually good EREOI, from 18-43:1. When it simply bubbles out of the bottom, all you need to do is cap it. Standard fuel was good as properly, from 20-40:1. Stick a metallic straw within the floor and low cost fuel got here out. Coal has an EREOI within the 40s as properly.

That’s an enormous motive why the Industrial Revolution occurred, as a result of there was an terrible lot of low cost, simply extracted fossil fuels mendacity in regards to the place. What’s that? Low-cost, simply extracted fossil fuels aren’t as available as they as soon as had been? We’re utilizing unconventional extraction strategies like shale fracturing for oil and fuel, and steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) for oil sands crude. These strategies use much more power. What does that do to their EREOI?

Properly, shale oil’s EREOI plummets to 1-2:1, under antiquated agriculture. Oil sands SAGD plummets to three.5-5.4:1, about the identical as fashionable agriculture. Fracked fuel has an EREOI of 5-10:1. Coal stays excessive, principally as a result of we’ve stopped mining for it and began simply disassembling mountains from the highest down with heavy equipment.

There’s a recreation the fossil gas trade likes to play with unconventional fossil gas extraction to fake the EREOI is greater, by the best way. What they do is use a lot of the fossil fuels that they’re extracting to energy the method of extracting fossil fuels. This, after all, is totally unabated that means a lot greater greenhouse fuel emissions, and it’s a fallacious financial argument as a result of they’re clearly paying the chance price of not promoting the fuels. Burning the home all the way down to warmth it isn’t precisely clever, and they’re doing that in two other ways.

After which there’s the issue of oil and fuel properly lifetimes. Pure ones have lengthy lifetimes with low annual proportion drops, however shale and fracked wells for oil and fuel see declines of 15% to twenty% per 12 months. That may considerably throw off EREOI calculations.

To be clear, there’s additionally one thing known as the power cliff. Under an EREOI of about 5, the associated fee per unit of power begins taking pictures upward making loads of as soon as financial issues deeply uneconomic from a systemic perspective. Sure, shale oil and the oil sands are within the zone of financial doom. And the converse is value contemplating. Above about 5:1, returns are marginal. The distinction between an EREOI of 10:1 and 40:1 is simply about 7% extra profit. Large numbers don’t matter as a lot as being above the 80% mark, or 5:1.

As we’ve seen above, there are a number of methods to play with EREOI to get the outcomes you need. A basic one for the fossil gas trade is to disregard unconventional oil and fuel, that are just about each marginal barrel and gigajoule of oil and use solely legacy oil. However we’re more and more utilizing unconventional strategies as a result of loads of the high-EREOI wells have dried up and that’s persevering with yearly.

That’s why we’re drilling within the Arctic, underneath the North Sea and deeper than ever. The identical technical innovation that has made Hubbert’s Peak Oil Provide merely a daunting story earlier than mattress has additionally decreased the EREOI of each marginal unit of power we extract now.

After which they wish to ignore the extra fast declines of fracked wells too, pretending that they will last more, spreading there preliminary fracking power over vastly extra barrels or gigajoules. Yeah, not so quick.

After which the identical sorts, for instance Goehring & Rozencwajg Associates, LLC, a hardcore fossil fuels funding agency which likes to confer with itself as contrarian, unfold large disinformation about renewables.

So lets discuss wind, water and photo voltaic.

Hydroelectric, as a result of dams final so lengthy, have the most effective EREOI’s going, typically over 100:1. Can’t beat an excellent dam, however you can also’t construct one with solely personal cash. The USA’s largest ones had been all constructed by the federal authorities in the course of the New Offers and are nonetheless owned and operated by it by means of the Bureau of Land Administration. China’s Three Gorges Dam and the dam in Nepal they’re constructing that dwarfs it, in addition to the smaller dams they’ve constructed over the previous 20 years, are all nationwide tasks, not entrepreneur’s tasks. When an asset is predicted to have a lifetime over 100 years, it’s arduous to get pure markets occupied with it.

There are a few straightforward methods to recreation renewables’ technology down, and disinformation distributors like GRA use each one they’ll. Let’s begin with wind power. Let’s decide wind power from the Nineties or 2000s as an alternative of recent wind farms which are a lot larger and have a lot better capability components. Let’s fake that wind farms don’t final so long as they do. Play these foolish video games and fairly quickly you may have crappy EREOI’s for wind power.

What’s the fashionable actuality? 19-20:1. Hmmm. Isn’t {that a} lengthy, great distance above all unconventional fossil fuels? I imply, a extremely great distance? And a extremely great distance above any issues about humanity falling off of a cliff?

What’s one other foolish recreation that the trade likes to play? How about pretending {that a} barrel of oil’s 1,700 kWh of warmth power is the same as 1,700 kWh from a wind turbine? Are they? Not an opportunity.

Let’s take an inner combustion automobile versus an electrical automobile. Let’s take 1,700 kWh value of petroleum out of the bottom and get the power to the wheels of the automobile. How environment friendly is that course of? About 20%. About 80% of the power will get thrown away, principally as waste warmth alongside the best way, though clearly loads of power will get thrown away for unconventional fuel and oil lengthy earlier than it will get to a automobile.

In the meantime, let’s go wind turbine to an electrical automobile’s wheels. How environment friendly is that course of? About 80%. Waste warmth once more within the type of shifting by means of wires and out and in of the battery, however nonetheless, 4 instances extra environment friendly than properly to wheel.

How about fuel properly to fuel furnace? That’s fairly good, after the fuel is extracted. It’s a reasonably straightforward molecule to place by means of pipelines and fashionable furnaces are fairly good. Properly to warmth effectivity is about 70% on common, a lot better than if you happen to had been making an attempt to get work out of it.

However what about photo voltaic panels to warmth pumps? Photo voltaic EREOI is 10:1 and sharp eyes will be aware the non-coincidence that the ratio between photo voltaic capability components and wind capability components is about the identical as EREOI to EREOI for the varieties. One of many video games the fossil gas trade likes to play is utilizing rooftop photo voltaic EREOI, 5-6:1 as an alternative of photo voltaic farms greater EREOI. Apples to apples is value remembering and searching for.

Transmitting and distributing electrical energy is much more environment friendly than pure fuel, about 5% losses from photo voltaic farm to warmth pump vs 7% of properly to furnace. However warmth pumps get a mean of three items of power of warmth out of the setting for each unit of power you get into them. Which means with the relative efficiencies, you get 4 instances as a lot warmth from electrical energy from photo voltaic panels as you do fuel from a properly.

GRA and others use the first power fallacy, that warmth power is the same as electrical energy, when you may get vastly extra work out of the identical quantity of electrical energy, to make renewables look dangerous and fossil fuels look good. And naturally they ignore warmth pumps totally.

An electrified world powered by renewables is a vastly extra environment friendly world. I replicated one thing that many have achieved, simply because I wish to run the numbers myself. The USA, for instance the place the information is on the market and properly defined sufficient to work with, would require about 50% as a lot major power within the type of low-carbon wind, water, photo voltaic (principally) and nuclear and geothermal, as they pump into the system as we speak, in the event that they had been totally electrified.

The doom and gloom degrowth crowd have a tendency to not like all these analyses both, though some notice that after we cease extracting virtually 20 billion tons of fossil fuels to principally burn yearly, that’s truly a large financial shift. The agricultural agrarian fantasists definitely don’t prefer it.

However the fossil gas trade simply hates the fact of this. What it makes clear is that the transition is way simpler than they’re pretending. It makes clear that the growing world can leapfrog loads of the high-inefficiency power flows that the developed world went by means of, and the growing world is, with a lot of electrical autos and renewables arising world wide.

Do you know two and three wheeled electrical autos have averted extra barrels of oil than all the remainder of the electrical autos on the earth mixed? That’s what BNEF reported final 12 months. The place are these small electrical autos? Properly, tons and plenty of them are within the growing world, the place vehicles are a lot much less widespread.

As for bioefuls? Properly, meta-analyses of a bunch of biofuels tasks discover that they’ve an EREOI under agriculture’s 4:1, however above 3:1. That is sensible. Creating biofuels requires principally actually outdated applied sciences like fermentation and distillation. The EREOI isn’t nice, but it surely’s ok so long as we protect it for locations the place it’s actually wanted, like lengthy haul transport and aviation. We’ll use battery and grid tied electrical for the remainder of transportation.

However what about artificial fuels made with inexperienced hydrogen? Properly, we’re taking electrical energy with is actually environment friendly at doing work or absurdly environment friendly at delivering warmth by means of warmth pumps and as an alternative throwing huge quantities of it away to make consumable fuels which run by means of inner combustion engines that function at 20% effectivity with excessive EREOI fossil fuels. We’re properly underneath biofuels, and a great distance underneath the place contemplating the benefit order of what else we could possibly be doing with inexperienced electrical energy.

It’s fairly straightforward for individuals who ought to in any other case know higher to be caught by this. The fossil gas trade has had many years to determine the way to idiot folks with these items. Very brilliant, properly educated and properly that means individuals who don’t spend a lot time have a look at renewables, transmission, storage and electrification are simply fooled into considering that the trade’s disinformation is credible.

The rationale I used to be triggered to sprint off this text was as a result of a kind of folks was ensnared by the dangerous arguments and amplified them as we speak. Don’t be that individual.