If World Cup nations had been going face to face primarily based on their oil and fuel emissions, who would win with the bottom local weather footprint?
Sports activities followers across the globe have been gripped by the FIFA Males’s World Cup, watching their nations’ soccer (or as we are saying in the USA, soccer) groups face off in Qatar with nice enthusiasm. Right here at RMI, we too are following the matches intently. The Local weather Intelligence Program is especially excited concerning the event as a result of there may be one massive factor that sports activities followers and local weather analysts have in frequent: they love information!
Whereas soccer followers might debate the skillful strengths of their group in opposition to the competitors, we are able to leverage the ability of clear emissions information to evaluate how the collaborating nations stack up of their oil and fuel local weather footprint. This led us to ask the query, “If World Cup nations had been going head-to-head primarily based on their oil and fuel emissions, who would win with the bottom local weather footprint?”
If World Cup nations had been going head-to-head primarily based on their oil and fuel emissions, who would win with the bottom local weather footprint?
Introducing the First Oil & Gasoline World Cup Bracket
To reply this query, we arrange a bracket much like the actual World Cup event bracket, with 32 beginning groups, the place the highest two groups (those with lowest emissions depth) in every group “advance.”
This football-inspired thought experiment required some modifications to the FIFA qualification course of. For fairer comparability, we eliminated any nation competing on this yr’s event that produces lower than 0.02% of world oil and fuel (like Japan, Switzerland, and Costa Rica), and substituted bigger producing nations (like Iraq, Norway, and China).
International locations had been assessed face to face primarily based on the emissions depth of their oil and fuel operations — together with manufacturing, processing, and transport — primarily based on a CO2e 20-year international warming potential. Emissions depth presents a superb metric for direct comparability as a result of it ranges the taking part in area by exhibiting whose oils and gases are “dirtier,” no matter quantity produced.
This evaluation was made potential thanks to 2 local weather intelligence databases: the Oil Local weather Index plus Gasoline and Local weather TRACE, which lately launched its up to date nation emissions inventories throughout COP27. Exterior of this whimsical software of the info, there are real-world local weather implications of differentiating oil and fuel assets by their emissions depth. Our hope is that by pulling again the veil on the local weather impacts of each oil and fuel useful resource globally with these instruments, policymakers and markets alike can take near-term steps to prioritize lower-emitting sources as all of us try to attain a 1.5°C future.
Be a part of us in watching the remainder of the World Cup event and see how our bracket stacks as much as actual outcomes!
© 2022 Rocky Mountain Institute. Revealed with permission. Initially posted on RMI Outlet.
Associated: Local weather TRACE Lifts The Veil On Oil & Gasoline Emissions
Recognize CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech information protection? Take into account changing into a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
Do not need to miss a cleantech story? Join each day information updates from CleanTechnica on e-mail. Or observe us on Google Information!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, need to promote, or need to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Speak podcast? Contact us right here.
