DOUG. SIM swapping, zero-days, the [dramatic voice] P-i-n-g of D-E-A-T-H, and LastPass… once more.
All that, and extra, on the Bare Safety podcast.
[MUSICAL MODEM]
Welcome to the podcast all people.
I’m Doug Aamoth.
With me, as all the time, is Paul Ducklin.
Paul, how do you do?
DUCK. Very properly, Doug.
You set some excessive drama sound into that intro, I’m happy to see!
DOUG. Nicely, how do you say “Ping of Demise” with out saying [doom metal growl] “P-i-n-g of D-E-A-T-H”?
You possibly can’t simply say [gentle voice] “Ping of Demise”.
You’ve obtained to punch it just a little bit…
DUCK. I suppose so.
It’s totally different in writing – what have you ever obtained?
Daring and italics.
I simply went with regular textual content, however I did use capital letters, which helps.
DOUG. Sure, I believe I might daring and italicise the phrase “demise”, so [doom metal again] “The Ping of D-E-A-T-H”.
DUCK. And use a number of colors!
I’ll try this subsequent time, Doug.
DOUG. Get away the outdated <blink> tag in HTML, make it blink just a little bit? [LAUGHS]
DUCK. Doug, for a second, I used to be nervous you had been going to make use of the phrase [LAUGHS] <marquee>.
DOUG. [LAUGHS] We love outdated stuff right here!
And that dovetails properly with our This Week in Tech Historical past section – I’m enthusiastic about this one as a result of I hadn’t heard about it, however stumbled throughout it.
This week, on 04 December 2001, the Goner worm ransacked the web at a tempo second solely to that of the Love Bug virus.
Goner unfold by way of Microsoft Outlook, and promised unsuspecting victims a enjoyable display screen saver when executed.
DUCK. Goner…
I believe it obtained that identify as a result of there was a popup on the finish, wasn’t there, that talked about the Pentagon?
However it was meant to be a pun – it was “Penta/Gone”.
That was actually the worm that reminded people who, actually, Home windows screensavers are simply executable applications.
So, should you had been looking specifically for .EXE information, properly, they might be wrapped up in .SCR (screensaver) information as properly.
In the event you had been solely counting on filenames, you could possibly simply be tricked.
And many individuals had been, sadly.
DOUG. Alright, we’ll go from the old-school to the new-school.
We’re speaking about LastPass: there was a breach; the breach itself wasn’t horrible; however that breach has now led to a different breach.
Or possibly that is only a continuation of the unique breach?
LastPass admits to buyer knowledge breach attributable to earlier breach
DUCK. Sure, LastPass has written about it primarily as a comply with as much as the earlier breach, which I believe was August 2022, wasn’t it?
And as we stated on the time, it was a really embarrassing search for LastPass.
However as breaches go, it was in all probability worse for his or her PR, advertising and marketing and (I suppose) for his or her mental property departments, as a result of it appears the primary factor the crooks made away with was supply code from their improvement system.
And LastPass was fast to reassure folks…
Firstly, their investigations urged that, while they had been in there, the crooks weren’t capable of make any unauthorised modifications which may later percolate into the actual code.
Secondly, entry to the event system doesn’t provide you with entry to the manufacturing system, the place the precise code is constructed.
And thirdly, they had been capable of say it appeared that no encrypted password vaults had been stolen, so the cloud storage of your encrypted passwords was not accessed.
And even when it had been accessed, then solely you’d know the password, as a result of the decryption (what you known as the “heavy lifting” once we spoke about it on the podcast) is definitely finished in reminiscence in your units – LastPass by no means sees your password.
After which, fourthly, they stated, so far as we will inform, on account of that breach, a number of the stuff that was within the improvement setting has now given both the identical… or presumably a totally totally different load of crooks who purchased the stolen knowledge off the earlier lot, who is aware of?
That did enable them to get into some cloud service the place some as-yet apparently unknown set of buyer knowledge was stolen.
I don’t suppose they fairly know but, as a result of it could actually take some time to work out what truly did get accessed after a breach occurred.
So I believe it’s honest to say that is type of the B-side of the unique breach.
DOUG. All proper, we recommend that should you’re a LastPass buyer, to keep watch over the corporate’s safety incident report.
We are going to keep watch over this story because it’s nonetheless creating.
And should you, like Paul and I, combat cybercrime for a dwelling, there are some glorious classes to be discovered from the Uber breach.
In order that’s a podcast episode – a “minisode” – with Chester Wisniewski that Paul has embedded on the backside of the LastPass article:
S3 Ep100.5: Uber breach – an professional speaks [Audio + Text]
Heaps to be taught on that entrance!
DUCK. As you say, that’s an excellent pay attention, as a result of it’s, I imagine, what is understood in America as “actionable recommendation”, or “information you need to use”.
DOUG. [LAUGHS] Great.
Talking of news-you-can’t-really-use, Apple is mostly tight-lipped about its safety updates… and there was a safety replace:
Apple pushes out iOS safety replace that’s extra tight-lipped than ever
DUCK. Oh, Doug, that’s considered one of your best… I like that segue.
DOUG. [LAUGHS] Thanks; thanks very a lot.
DUCK. Sure, this stunned me.
I believed, “Nicely, I’ll seize the replace as a result of it sounds critical.”
And I gave myself the rationale, “Let me do it for Bare Safety readers.”
As a result of if I do it and there are not any side-effects, then I can not less than say to different folks, “Look, I simply blindly did it and no hurt got here to me. So possibly you are able to do it as properly.”
I simply immediately observed that there was an iOS 16.1.2 replace accessible, though I had had no safety advisory electronic mail from Apple.
No electronic mail?!
That’s bizarre.. so I went to the HT201222 portal web page that Apple has for its safety bulletins, and there it was: iOS 16.1.2.
And what does it say, Doug, “Particulars will comply with quickly”?
DOUG. And did they comply with quickly?
DUCK. Nicely, that was greater than every week in the past, they usually’re not there but.
So are we speaking “quickly” that means hours, days, weeks, or months?
In the meanwhile, it’s trying like weeks.
And, as all the time with Apple, there’s no indication of something to do with some other working programs.
Have they been forgotten?
Do they not want the replace?
Did in addition they want the replace, however it’s simply not prepared but?
Have they been dropped out of assist?
However it did appear, as I stated within the headline, much more tight-lipped than regular for Apple, and never essentially essentially the most useful factor on this planet.
DOUG. OK, excellent… nonetheless some questions, which leads us to our subsequent story.
A really attention-grabbing query!
Generally, while you join a service and it enforces two-factor authentication, it says, “Do you wish to get notified by way of textual content message, or do you wish to use an authentication app?”
And this story is a cautionary story to not use your telephone – use an authentication app, even when it’s just a little bit extra cumbersome.
This can be a very attention-grabbing story:
SIM swapper despatched to jail for 2FA cryptocurrency heist of over $20m
DUCK. It’s, Doug!
In the event you’ve ever misplaced a cell phone, or locked your self out of your SIM card by placing within the PIN incorrectly too many occasions, you’ll know which you can go into the cell phone store…
…and normally they’ll ask for ID or one thing, and also you say, “Hey, I want a brand new SIM card.”
They usually’ll generate one for you.
Once you put it into your telephone, bingo!… it’s obtained your outdated quantity on it.
So what which means is that if a criminal can undergo the identical train that you’d to persuade the cell phone firm that they’ve “misplaced” or “damaged” their SIM card (i.e. *your SIM card*), they usually can get that card both handed to, or despatched to, or given to them by some means…
…then, once they plug it into their telephone, they begin getting your SMS two-factor authentication codes, *and* your telephone stops working.
That’s the dangerous information.
The excellent news on this article is that this was a case of a chap who obtained busted for it.
He’s been despatched to jail within the US for 18 months.
He, with a bunch of accomplices – or, within the phrases of the Division of Justice, the Scheme Contributors… [LAUGHS]
…they made off with one explicit sufferer’s cryptocurrency, apparently to the tune of $20 million, should you don’t thoughts.
DOUG. Oof!
DUCK. So he agreed to plead responsible, take a jail sentence, and instantly forfeit… the quantity was [reading carefully] $983,010.72… simply to forfeit that straight away.
So, presumably, he had that mendacity round.
And he apparently additionally has some form of authorized obligation to refund over $20 million.
DOUG. Good luck with that, everybody! Good luck.
His different [vocal italics] Scheme Contributors may trigger some points there! [LAUGHS]
DUCK. Sure, I don’t know what occurs in the event that they refuse to cooperate as properly.
Like, if they only cling him out to dry, what occurs?
However we’ve obtained some suggestions, and a few recommendation on find out how to beef up safety (in additional methods than simply the 2FA you employ) within the article.
So go and skim that… each little bit helps.
DOUG. OK, talking of “little bits”…
…this was one other fascinating story, how the lowly ping can be utilized to set off distant code execution:
Ping of demise! FreeBSD fixes crashtastic bug in community software
DUCK. [Liking the segue again] I believe you’ve bettered your self, Doug!
DOUG. [LAUGHS] I’m on a roll at the moment…
DUCK. From Apple to the [weak attempt at doom vocals] Ping of D-E-A-T-H!
Sure, this was an intriguing bug.
I don’t suppose it’ll actually trigger many individuals a lot hurt, and it *is* patched, so fixing it’s simple.
However there’s an excellent writeup within the FreeBSD safety advisory…
…and it makes for an entertaining, and, if I say so myself, a really informative story for the present era of programmers who could have relied on,”Third-party libraries will simply do it for me. Coping with low stage community packets? I by no means have to consider it…”
There are some nice classes to be discovered right here.
The ping utility, which is the one community software that just about all people is aware of about it, will get its identify from SONAR.
You go [makes movie submarine noise] ping, after which the echo comes again from the server on the different finish.
And it is a characteristic that’s constructed into the Web Protocol, IP, utilizing a factor known as ICMP, which is Web Management Message Protocol.
It’s a particular, low-level protocol, a lot decrease than UDP or TCP that individuals are in all probability used to, that’s just about designed for precisely this type of factor: “Are you truly even alive on the different finish, earlier than I’m going worrying about why your internet server isn’t working?”
There’s a particular form of packet you’ll be able to ship out known as “ICMP Echo”.
So, you ship this tiny little packet with a brief message in it (the message might be something you want), and it merely sends that exact same message again to you.
It’s only a primary manner of claiming, “If that message doesn’t come again, both the community or all the server is down”, somewhat than that there’s some software program drawback on the pc.
By analogy with SONAR, this system that sends out these echo requests is named… [pause] I’m going to do the sound impact, Doug … [fake submarine movie noise again] ping. [LAUGHTER]
And the concept is, you go, say, ping -c3 (which means verify 3 times) nakedsecurity.sophos.com.
You are able to do that proper now, and it is best to get three replies, every of them one second aside, from the WordPress servers that host our web site.
And it’s saying the location is alive.
It’s not telling you that the net server is up; it’s not telling you that WordPress is up; it’s not telling that Bare Safety is definitely accessible to learn.
However it not less than it confirms which you can see the server, and the server can attain you.
And who would have thought that that lowly little ping reply may journey up the FreeBSD ping program in such a manner {that a} rogue server may ship again a booby trapped “Sure, I’m alive” message that might, in principle (in principle solely; I don’t suppose anybody has finished this in follow) set off distant code execution in your laptop.
DOUG. Sure, that’s wonderful; that’s the wonderful half.
Even when it’s a proof-of-concept, it’s such a small little factor!
DUCK. The ping program itself will get the entire IP packet again, and it’s imagined to divide it into two elements.
Usually, the kernel would deal with this for you, so that you’d simply see the info half.
However while you’re coping with what are known as uncooked sockets, what you get again is the Web Protocol header, which simply says, “Hey, these bytes got here from such and such a server.”
And then you definitely get a factor known as the “ICMP Echo Reply”, which is the second half of the packet you get again.
Now, these packets, they’re usually simply 100 bytes or so, and if it’s IPv4, the primary 20 bytes are the IP header and the rest, no matter it’s, is the Echo Reply.
That has just a few bytes to say, “That is an Echo Reply,” after which the unique message that went out coming again.
And so the plain factor to do, Doug, while you get it, is you cut up it into…
…the IP header, which is 20 bytes lengthy, and the remainder.
Guess the place the issue lies?
DOUG. Do inform!
DUCK. The issue is that IP headers are *nearly all the time* 20 bytes lengthy – actually, I don’t suppose I’ve ever seen one which wasn’t.
And you may inform they’re 20 bytes lengthy as a result of the primary byte shall be hexadecimal 0x45.
The “4”” means IPv4, and the “5”… “Oh, we’ll use that to say how lengthy the header is.”
You are taking that quantity 5 and also you multiply it by 4 (for 32-bit values), and also you get 20 bytes..
…and that’s the dimension of in all probability six sigma’s value of IP headers that you’ll ever see in the entire world, Doug. [LAUGHTER]
However they *can* go as much as 60 bytes.
In the event you put 0x4F as an alternative of 0x45, that claims there are 0xF (or 15 in decimal) × 4 = 60 bytes within the header.
And the FreeBSD code merely took that header and copied it right into a buffer on the stack that was 20 bytes in dimension.
A easy, old-school stack buffer overflow.
It’s a case of a venerable community troubleshooting software with a venerable kind of bug in it. (Nicely, not any extra.)
So, if you end up programming and you need to take care of low-level stuff that no one’s actually thought of for ages, don’t simply go together with the obtained knowledge that claims, “Oh, it’ll all the time be 20 bytes; you’ll by no means see something greater.”
As a result of at some point you may.
And when that day comes, it could be there intentionally as a result of a criminal made it so on goal.
So the satan, as all the time, is within the programming particulars, Doug.
DOUG. OK, very attention-grabbing; nice story.
And we are going to stick with reference to code with this last story about Chrome.
One other zero-day, which brings the 2022 complete to 9 occasions:
Quantity 9! Chrome fixes one other 2022 zero-day, Edge patched too
DUCK. [Formal voice, sounding like a recording] “Quantity 9. Quantity 9. Quantity 9, quantity 9,” Douglas.
DOUG. [LAUGHS] Is that this Yoko Ono?
DUCK. That’s Revolution 9 off the Beatles “White Album”.
Yoko might be heard riffing away in that music – that soundscape, I imagine they name it – however apparently the bit initially the place there’s someone saying “Quantity 9, quantity 9” again and again, it was, actually, a take a look at tape they discovered mendacity round.
DOUG. Ah, very cool.
DUCK. An EMI engineer saying one thing like, “That is EMI take a look at tape quantity 9” [LAUGHTER], and apparently I don’t even suppose anybody is aware of whose voice it was.
That has *nothing* to do with Chrome, Doug.
However provided that someone commented on Fb the opposite day, “That Paul man is beginning to appear like a Beatle”… [quizzical] which I discovered barely odd.
DOUG. [LAUGHS] Sure, how are you imagined to take that?
DUCK. …I figured I may dine out on “Quantity 9”.
It’s the ninth zero-day of the yr to date, it appears, Doug.
And it’s a one-bug repair, with the bug recognized as CVE 2022-4282.
As a result of Microsoft Edge makes use of the Chromium open-source core, it too was weak, and a few days later, Microsoft adopted up with an replace for Edge.
So that is each a Chrome and an Edge challenge.
Though these browsers ought to replace themselves, I like to recommend going to verify anyway – we present you ways to try this within the article – simply in case.
I received’t learn out the model numbers right here as a result of they’re totally different for Mac, Linux and Home windows on Chrome, they usually’re totally different once more for Edge.
Like Apple, Google’s being a bit tight-lipped about this one.
It was discovered by considered one of their menace searching group, I do imagine.
So I think about they discovered it whereas investigating an incident that occurred within the wild, and due to this fact they in all probability wish to maintain it beneath their hat, despite the fact that Google normally has rather a lot to say about “openness” on the subject of bug-fixing.
You possibly can see why, in a case like this, you may want just a little little bit of time to dig just a little bit deeper earlier than you inform all people precisely the way it works.
DOUG. Glorious… and we do have a reader query that’s in all probability a query lots of people are pondering.
Cassandra asks, “Are the bug finders simply getting fortunate at discovering bugs? Or have they struck a ‘seam’ stuffed with bugs? Or is Chromium issuing new code that’s extra buggy than regular? Or is one thing else happening?”
DUCK. Sure, that’s an excellent query, truly, and I’m afraid that I may solely reply it in a barely facetious type of manner, Doug.
As a result of Cassandra had given decisions A), B) and C), I stated, “Nicely, possibly it’s D) All the above.”
We do know that when a bug of 1 explicit type reveals up in code, then it’s cheap to imagine that the identical programmer could have made comparable bugs elsewhere within the software program.
Or different programmers on the identical firm could have been utilizing what was thought of obtained knowledge or customary follow on the time, and will have adopted go well with.
And an excellent instance Is, should you look again at Log4J… there was a repair to patch the issue.
After which, once they went trying, “Oh, truly, there are different locations the place comparable errors have been made.”
So there was a repair for the repair, after which there was a repair for the repair for the repair, If I keep in mind.
There’s, after all, additionally the difficulty that while you add new code, chances are you’ll get bugs which might be distinctive to that new code and are available about due to including options.
And that’s why many browsers, Chrome included, have an if-you-like “barely older” model which you can follow.
And the concept is that these “older” releases… they’ve not one of the new options, however all the related safety fixes.
So, if you wish to be conservative about new options, you might be.
However we actually know that, typically, while you shovel new options right into a product, new bugs include the brand new options.
And you may inform that, for instance, when there’s an replace, say, in your iPhone, and also you get updates, say, for iOS 15 and iOS 16.
Then, while you have a look at the bug lists, there are few bugs that solely apply to iOS 16.
And also you suppose, “Howdy, these should be bugs within the code that weren’t there earlier than.”
So, sure, that’s a chance.
And I believe the opposite issues which might be happening might be thought of good.
The primary is that I believe that, notably for issues like browsers, the browser makers are getting a lot better at pushing out full rebuilds actually, actually shortly.
DOUG. Fascinating.
DUCK. And I believe the opposite factor that’s modified is that, previously, you could possibly argue that for a lot of distributors… it was fairly tough to get folks to use patches in any respect, even once they got here out solely on a month-to-month schedule, and even when they’d a number of zero-day fixes in them.
I believe, possibly it is also a response to the truth that increasingly of us are increasingly probably not simply to simply accept, however truly to *count on* computerized updating that’s actually immediate.
So, I believe you’ll be able to learn some good things into this.
The very fact not solely that Google can push out a single zero-day repair nearly instantaneously, but additionally that individuals are prepared to simply accept that and even to demand it.
So I prefer to see that challenge of, “Wow, 9 zero-days within the yr fastened individually!”…
…I like to consider that extra as “glass half fill and filling up” than “glass half empty and draining via a small gap within the backside”. [LAUGHTER]
That’s my opinion.
DOUG. Alright, excellent.
Thanks for the query, Cassandra.
When you have an attention-grabbing story, remark or query you’d prefer to submit, we’d like to learn it on the podcast.
You possibly can electronic mail suggestions@sophos.com, you’ll be able to touch upon any considered one of our articles, or you’ll be able to hit us up on social: @NakedSecurity.
That’s our present for at the moment; thanks very a lot for listening.
For Paul Ducklin, I’m Doug Aamoth, reminding you: Till subsequent time…
BOTH. Keep safe!
[MUSICAL MODEM]
