Refactoring with Codemods to Automate API Modifications

Clear a Stale Characteristic Toggle

Let’s begin with a easy but sensible instance to display the
energy of codemods. Think about you’re utilizing a function
toggle in your
codebase to manage the discharge of unfinished or experimental options.
As soon as the function is reside in manufacturing and dealing as anticipated, the subsequent
logical step is to wash up the toggle and any associated logic.

As an example, take into account the next code:

const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { identify: 'Product' } : undefined;

As soon as the function is absolutely launched and not wants a toggle, this
could be simplified to:

const knowledge = { identify: 'Product' };

The duty entails discovering all cases of featureToggle within the
codebase, checking whether or not the toggle refers to
feature-new-product-list, and eradicating the conditional logic surrounding
it. On the similar time, different function toggles (like
feature-search-result-refinement, which can nonetheless be in growth)
ought to stay untouched. The codemod must perceive the construction
of the code to use modifications selectively.

Understanding the AST

Earlier than we dive into writing the codemod, let’s break down how this
particular code snippet appears in an AST. You should use instruments like AST
Explorer to visualise how supply code and AST
are mapped. It’s useful to grasp the node sorts you are interacting
with earlier than making use of any modifications.

The picture beneath reveals the syntax tree by way of ECMAScript syntax. It
accommodates nodes like Identifier (for variables), StringLiteral (for the
toggle identify), and extra summary nodes like CallExpression and
ConditionalExpression.

Determine 2: The Summary Syntax Tree illustration of the function toggle examine

On this AST illustration, the variable knowledge is assigned utilizing a
ConditionalExpression. The check a part of the expression calls
featureToggle('feature-new-product-list'). If the check returns true,
the consequent department assigns { identify: 'Product' } to knowledge. If
false, the alternate department assigns undefined.

For a job with clear enter and output, I want writing checks first,
then implementing the codemod. I begin by defining a adverse case to
guarantee we don’t by accident change issues we wish to depart untouched,
adopted by an actual case that performs the precise conversion. I start with
a easy situation, implement it, then add a variation (like checking if
featureToggle is known as inside an if assertion), implement that case, and
guarantee all checks cross.

This method aligns properly with Take a look at-Pushed Improvement (TDD), even
when you don’t apply TDD commonly. Figuring out precisely what the
transformation’s inputs and outputs are earlier than coding improves security and
effectivity, particularly when tweaking codemods.

With jscodeshift, you may write checks to confirm how the codemod
behaves:

const remodel = require("../remove-feature-new-product-list");

defineInlineTest(
  remodel,
  {},
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { identify: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  `
  const knowledge = { identify: 'Product' };
  `,
  "delete the toggle feature-new-product-list in conditional operator"
);

The defineInlineTest perform from jscodeshift lets you outline
the enter, anticipated output, and a string describing the check’s intent.
Now, working the check with a traditional jest command will fail as a result of the
codemod isn’t written but.

The corresponding adverse case would make sure the code stays unchanged
for different function toggles:

defineInlineTest(
  remodel,
  {},
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { identify: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { identify: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  "don't change different function toggles"
);

Writing the Codemod

Let’s begin by defining a easy remodel perform. Create a file
known as remodel.js with the next code construction:

module.exports = perform(fileInfo, api, choices) {
  const j = api.jscodeshift;
  const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

  // manipulate the tree nodes right here

  return root.toSource();
};

This perform reads the file right into a tree and makes use of jscodeshift’s API to
question, modify, and replace the nodes. Lastly, it converts the AST again to
supply code with .toSource().

Now we are able to begin implementing the remodel steps:

1. Discover all cases of featureToggle.
2. Confirm that the argument handed is 'feature-new-product-list'.
3. Change the complete conditional expression with the consequent half,
   successfully eradicating the toggle.

Right here’s how we obtain this utilizing jscodeshift:

module.exports = perform (fileInfo, api, choices) {
  const j = api.jscodeshift;
  const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

  // Discover ConditionalExpression the place the check is featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')
  root
    .discover(j.ConditionalExpression, {
      check: {
        callee: { identify: "featureToggle" },
        arguments: [{ value: "feature-new-product-list" }],
      },
    })
    .forEach((path) => {
      // Change the ConditionalExpression with the 'consequent'
      j(path).replaceWith(path.node.consequent);
    });

  return root.toSource();
};

The codemod above:

• Finds ConditionalExpression nodes the place the check calls
  featureToggle('feature-new-product-list').
• Replaces the complete conditional expression with the resultant (i.e., {
identify: 'Product' }), eradicating the toggle logic and leaving simplified code
  behind.

This instance demonstrates how simple it’s to create a helpful
transformation and apply it to a big codebase, considerably decreasing
guide effort.

You’ll want to jot down extra check instances to deal with variations like
if-else statements, logical expressions (e.g.,
!featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')), and so forth to make the
codemod strong in real-world situations.

As soon as the codemod is prepared, you may check it out on a goal codebase,
such because the one you are engaged on. jscodeshift gives a command-line
instrument that you should use to use the codemod and report the outcomes.

$ jscodeshift -t transform-name src/

After validating the outcomes, examine that every one practical checks nonetheless
cross and that nothing breaks—even when you’re introducing a breaking change.
As soon as happy, you may commit the modifications and lift a pull request as
a part of your regular workflow.

Codemods Enhance Code High quality and Maintainability

Codemods aren’t simply helpful for managing breaking API modifications—they will
considerably enhance code high quality and maintainability. As codebases
evolve, they usually accumulate technical debt, together with outdated function
toggles, deprecated strategies, or tightly coupled elements. Manually
refactoring these areas could be time-consuming and error-prone.

By automating refactoring duties, codemods assist hold your codebase clear
and freed from legacy patterns. Recurrently making use of codemods lets you
implement new coding requirements, take away unused code, and modernize your
codebase with out having to manually modify each file.

Refactoring an Avatar Part

Now, let’s take a look at a extra complicated instance. Suppose you’re working with
a design system that features an Avatar part tightly coupled with a
Tooltip. At any time when a person passes a identify prop into the Avatar, it
mechanically wraps the avatar with a tooltip.

Determine 3: A avatar part with a tooltip

Right here’s the present Avatar implementation:

import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip";

const Avatar = ({ identify, picture }: AvatarProps) => {
  if (identify) {
    return (
      <Tooltip content material={identify}>
        <CircleImage picture={picture} />
      </Tooltip>
    );
  }

  return <CircleImage picture={picture} />;
};

The objective is to decouple the Tooltip from the Avatar part,
giving builders extra flexibility. Builders ought to have the ability to determine
whether or not to wrap the Avatar in a Tooltip. Within the refactored model,
Avatar will merely render the picture, and customers can apply a Tooltip
manually if wanted.

Right here’s the refactored model of Avatar:

const Avatar = ({ picture }: AvatarProps) => {
  return <CircleImage picture={picture} />;
};

Now, customers can manually wrap the Avatar with a Tooltip as
wanted:

import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip";
import { Avatar } from "@design-system/avatar";

const UserProfile = () => {
  return (
    <Tooltip content material="Juntao Qiu">
      <Avatar picture="/juntao.qiu.avatar.png" />
    </Tooltip>
  );
};

The problem arises when there are lots of of Avatar usages unfold
throughout the codebase. Manually refactoring every occasion can be extremely
inefficient, so we are able to use a codemod to automate this course of.

Utilizing instruments like AST Explorer, we are able to
examine the part and see which nodes characterize the Avatar utilization
we’re focusing on. An Avatar part with each identify and picture props
is parsed into an summary syntax tree as proven beneath:

Determine 4: AST of the Avatar part utilization

Writing the Codemod

Let’s break down the transformation into smaller duties:

• Discover Avatar utilization within the part tree.
• Test if the identify prop is current.
• If not, do nothing.
• If current:
• Create a Tooltip node.
• Add the identify to the Tooltip.
• Take away the identify from Avatar.
• Add Avatar as a baby of the Tooltip.
• Change the unique Avatar node with the brand new Tooltip.

To start, we’ll discover all cases of Avatar (I’ll omit a number of the
checks, however you must write comparability checks first).

defineInlineTest(
    { default: remodel, parser: "tsx" },
    {},
    `
    <Avatar identify="Juntao Qiu" picture="/juntao.qiu.avatar.png" />
    `,
    `
    <Tooltip content material="Juntao Qiu">
      <Avatar picture="/juntao.qiu.avatar.png" />
    </Tooltip>
    `,
    "wrap avatar with tooltip when identify is supplied"
  );

Much like the featureToggle instance, we are able to use root.discover with
search standards to find all Avatar nodes:

root
  .discover(j.JSXElement, {
    openingElement: { identify: { identify: "Avatar" } },
  })
  .forEach((path) => {
    // now we are able to deal with every Avatar occasion
  });

Subsequent, we examine if the identify prop is current:

root
  .discover(j.JSXElement, {
    openingElement: { identify: { identify: "Avatar" } },
  })
  .forEach((path) => {
    const avatarNode = path.node;

    const nameAttr = avatarNode.openingElement.attributes.discover(
      (attr) => attr.identify.identify === "identify"
    );

    if (nameAttr) {
      const tooltipElement = createTooltipElement(
        nameAttr.worth.worth,
        avatarNode
      );
      j(path).replaceWith(tooltipElement);
    }
  });

For the createTooltipElement perform, we use the
jscodeshift API to create a brand new JSX node, with the identify
prop utilized to the Tooltip and the Avatar
part as a baby. Lastly, we name replaceWith to
change the present path.

Right here’s a preview of the way it appears in
Hypermod, the place the codemod is written on
the left. The highest half on the appropriate is the unique code, and the underside
half is the reworked consequence:

Determine 5: Run checks inside hypermod earlier than apply it to your codebase

This codemod searches for all cases of Avatar. If a
identify prop is discovered, it removes the identify prop
from Avatar, wraps the Avatar inside a
Tooltip, and passes the identify prop to the
Tooltip.

By now, I hope it’s clear that codemods are extremely helpful and
that the workflow is intuitive, particularly for large-scale modifications the place
guide updates can be an enormous burden. Nonetheless, that is not the entire
image. Within the subsequent part, I’ll make clear a number of the challenges
and the way we are able to deal with these less-than-ideal points.