The information blew up on social media on July 11 after just a few outstanding influencer accounts belatedly picked it up. It turned the highest trending matter on Weibo that day, with customers questioning whether or not WPS is infringing on their privateness. Since then, The Financial Observer, a Chinese language publication, has reported that a number of different on-line novelists have had their drafts locked for unclear causes up to now.
Mitu’s criticism triggered a social media dialogue in China about censorship and tech platform duty. It has additionally highlighted the strain between Chinese language customers’ growing consciousness of privateness and tech corporations’ obligation to censor on behalf of the federal government. “This can be a case the place maybe we’re seeing that these two issues certainly would possibly collide,” says Tom Nunlist, an analyst on China’s cyber and knowledge coverage on the Beijing-based analysis group Trivium China
Whereas Mitu’s doc has been saved on-line and was beforehand shared with an editor in 2021, she says she had been the one particular person modifying it this 12 months, when it was out of the blue locked. “The content material is all clear and might even be printed on a [literature] web site, however WPS determined it ought to be locked. Who gave it the precise to look into customers’ non-public paperwork and determine what to do with them arbitrarily?” she wrote.
First launched in 1989 by the Chinese language software program firm Kingsoft, WPS claims to have 310 million month-to-month customers. It has partly benefited from authorities grants and contracts because the Chinese language authorities seemed to bolster its personal companies over international rivals on safety grounds.
